<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using GridGain&#8217;s Topology SPI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/gridgain-topology-spi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/gridgain-topology-spi/</link>
	<description>Scripting, Software Engineering and Stuff in Between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mafr</title>
		<link>http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/gridgain-topology-spi/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>mafr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>In GridGain, you have service provider interfaces (SPIs), so the names of those java interfaces are DiscoverySpi, TopologySpi etc. However, the classes that implement those interfaces (like GridBasicTopologySpi) are service providers and not interfaces, so I&#039;d expect a different naming convention: GridBasicTopologySp, or maybe GridBasicTopologyProvider, without the &#039;i&#039; at the end :)

That&#039;s just a minor glitch, and I follow it in my own service providers for consistency.

Cheers,
  Matthias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In GridGain, you have service provider interfaces (SPIs), so the names of those java interfaces are DiscoverySpi, TopologySpi etc. However, the classes that implement those interfaces (like GridBasicTopologySpi) are service providers and not interfaces, so I&#8217;d expect a different naming convention: GridBasicTopologySp, or maybe GridBasicTopologyProvider, without the &#8216;i&#8217; at the end :)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just a minor glitch, and I follow it in my own service providers for consistency.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
  Matthias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikita Ivanov</title>
		<link>http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/gridgain-topology-spi/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikita Ivanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmaintainable.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>Hi Matthias,
Great job! What I am missing is what do you mean by:

&quot;the “i” is used consistently in GridGain, although it’s counter-intuitive&quot;

What do you mean by &quot;i&quot; and what is counter-intuitive? 

Thanks!
Nikita.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthias,<br />
Great job! What I am missing is what do you mean by:</p>
<p>&#8220;the “i” is used consistently in GridGain, although it’s counter-intuitive&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you mean by &#8220;i&#8221; and what is counter-intuitive? </p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Nikita.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
